Are you in?
Civil engineers around the world have begun taking a pledge to support the ASCE Grand Challenge and its goal of cutting infrastructure life-cycle costs in half by 2025.
The ASCE 2016 Convention, Sept. 28–Oct. 1 in Portland, OR, was an ideal venue for engineers of varying specialties to share ideas and strategies to achieve the goal.
“Seeing where we are as far as the funding goes and seeing where we’re headed with the cost of infrastructure, it all can seem too much,” said Sam Richmann, a Portland State University civil engineering student at the convention. “But I think with the Grand Challenge, ASCE has done a great job of saying, ‘Yeah, it’s scary, but we can do this.’”
A new ASCE Grand Challenge website is encouraging civil engineers to support the initiative by clicking an “I’m in!” button. While there, visitors can share relevant professional experiences, follow updates on outreach projects, and more.
Four paths to success
Potential ASCE Grand Challenge solutions revolve around four key elements: life-cycle cost analysis, performance-based standards, resilience, and innovation. Each was a recurring theme at the ASCE 2016 Convention, particularly innovation.
“Innovation is interesting because one of the things is it sometimes takes a little bit longer to consider. Innovation doesn’t happen in that fast framework of things you’re familiar with in your routine,” said Kristie Dunkin, a managing director for the Chambers Group in Santa Ana, CA. “It happens in the times when you can sit back and think about something. One of the fundamental approaches is to give people some time to think about things.”
Industry Leaders Forum
Convention events encouraged that space to think about innovation. Opening keynote speaker Frans Johansson talked about how diversity in people and ideas drives innovation, while closing speaker Gabie Figueroa outlined a similar form of intersection in her own career as a civil engineer and professional women’s hockey player.
ASCE’s Industry Leaders Council conducted another in its series of Industry Leaders Forums during the convention. This year’s was a roundtable conversation led by ILC member Jerry Buckwalter, A.M.ASCE, director of strategy for Northrop Grumman, with Jeffrey Purdy, P.E., associate vice president of Intelligent Infrastructure Systems, Jason Magalen, P.E., M.ASCE, coastal engineer for HDR and 2016 ASCE Innovation Contest winner, and Frank Moon, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, Rutgers University professor.
“We have a great deal of fragmentation,” Moon said. “This divide-and-conquer mentality has broken apart a lot of different fields. I believe the history of this century is going to be about integration.”
Second, expanded Innovation Contest underway
ASCE launched its second Innovation Contest on Sept. 1, and will be accepting submittals through March 1. Buckwalter and the ILC designed last year’s contest, which gave its winners the chance to present their ideas to top industry decision-makers.
“I think we’ll build on the great foundation that we laid with the first one,” said Buckwalter, who, with the ILC, developed the Innovation Contest patterned off a similar program he ran at his company. “We had a wide range of contestants, a wide range of ideas, and I really think the depth and quality of the concepts will be even better this time.”
Buckwalter said the important thing is not only having a great idea but articulating it well.
“The Innovation Contest is not the only component of getting to the Grand Challenge, but I really believe it’s a very important one because you have to be innovative,” he said. “You can’t just work things the way you did before. And the more we find ways to tease those out the better off we’ll be as an industry.”
Everything about the ASCE Grand Challenge is on a large scale.
The notion of life-cycle cost analysis considers infrastructure decades out. Resilient design, meanwhile, requires a complete understanding of a project’s context.
A Grand Challenge session at the convention split attendees into groups to seek and apply innovative, big-picture approaches to solve hypothetical problems. Context and community were common threads in each group’s solution.
“The diversity needs to be a lot more than the individuals in the room or the engineers involved,” said Michael Scancarello, EIT, A.M.ASCE, a Younger Member who works as a structural engineer for Odeh Engineers in Providence, RI.
“The diversity needs to include the residents of the towns that we’re talking about. It needs to include the policymakers; it needs to include the lawmakers. Educating them is going to be a big goal toward releasing some of those impediments that we have right now, some of the things that are holding us back,” Scancarello stressed.
“It’s a global problem, but it’s not a global engineering problem. It’s a global people problem.”