Former N.Y. Building Congress Leader Urges Infrastructure Investment

September 5, 2017
Richard Anderson, president emeritus for the New York Building Congress
Richard Anderson, president emeritus for the New York Building Congress

There is plenty of optimism surrounding the push for more sustainable infrastructure. Plenty of pessimism too.

Richard Anderson, president emeritus of the New York Building Congress, falls firmly into the camp in between: realism.

He advocated for strategic infrastructure investment for 22 years as the New York Building Congress president. So when he says, “There’s no substitute for governmental leadership,” it’s equal parts wisdom and warning.

A featured speaker at the 2017 ASCE International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure, Oct. 26-28 in Brooklyn, Anderson offered a heady dose of real talk in a conversation with ASCE News.

ASCE News: These are issues you’ve been working on for a long time. I’m wondering if you’ve seen a progression in terms of how receptive some of the owners and stakeholders might be now toward sustainable infrastructure ideas?

Richard Anderson: “Unfortunately, that sounds like wishful thinking. We are devoting a lower percentage of gross national product to infrastructure investment than at any time in the last century. So while people may be saying the right things as a nation, we’re not doing the right things.

ASCE News: So how do you make that case to those owners that this is absolutely necessary?

Anderson: “The constituency for infrastructure is everybody. We all depend on the water systems, the transportation systems, the aviation systems in this country.

“You talk about stakeholders and it’s all of us. We have met the enemy and it is us.

“So what’s happened is that national resources have been directed in other ways, to social programs, national defense. Things that didn’t occupy as much of our national resources in the past, now occupy a lot more.

“There is not as much available for infrastructure investment. So we have to find ways to shift the equation and to generate additional revenue dedicated to infrastructure.”

ASCE News: Which I suppose could mean more advocacy or more innovative engineering. What are, do you think, the best ways forward?

Anderson: “We just have to convince the American public that they have to dig into their pockets to come up with money for infrastructure investment. And we can find innovative ways to do that. Some of the states – because the federal government is not leading the way as it has in the past – are biting the bullet. They are dedicating new taxes to transportation in particular but also to water and sewer development and other forms of infrastructure.”

ICSI Banner LinkASCE News: What’s your take on P3s as a large-scale solution to a lot of these problems?

Anderson: “Because of what we’ve been saying, with public investment limited, private investment has to be considered. The challenge for public-private partnerships is to find effective ways of doing it and then get the individual states to enable public-private partnerships.

“In New York state, for example, we have yet to achieve legislation that would permit widespread use of P3s, and that’s a real limitation. Once you get over that hurdle, you have to find suitable projects and develop a formula that works.

“So it’s part of the solution but not the total solution.”

ASCE News: Let’s talk about your work there in New York. What have been some of the things you’ve done that can be held up as success stories or recommended as successful strategies?

Anderson: “New York has a number of success stories. We’ve been led by a governor, Andrew Cuomo, who believes in infrastructure investment. He has an overall state program that amounts to about $100 billion that includes public-private partnerships for the rebuilding of LaGuardia Airport, for a new Goethals Bridge from Staten Island to New Jersey, and other kinds of projects.

“He has encouraged the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to approve its latest five-year capital program; the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has a 10-year capital program; and he’s come up with a number of other innovative projects. He’s firmly behind a new rail tunnel between New York and New Jersey that is desperately needed, for economic and environmental reasons.

“The successes of New York are led by its chief executive, and this is really very important. We have our new bridge, the [rebuilt] Kosciuszko Bridge – a $500 million undertaking that was done design-build with Skanska as the contractor. A great success story, and the governor was very pleased with that.

“So it’s not all doom and gloom in New York, just as it’s not all doom and gloom across the country. We have success stories. The challenge is generating more success stories, because the need is so enormous.

“And as the American Society of Civil Engineers has pointed out, we have a huge infrastructure deficit in this country. The latest rating was a D+. When I was in school, that wasn’t a very good grade.”

2 Comments
  • ASCE you are doing excellent job. Keep helping those Civil Engineers fighting to help the last human being stuck in darkness.
    We would like to appreciate your Team for courage to face Natural calamity in helping people with novel idea enthusiasm and courage.

    Thanks.

    Niaz ahmad.

  • Dick – enjoyed this article and appreciate your continuing active role in NY infrastructure. I’m now in the Wash. DC area and do miss the local issues, but continuing, and enjoying, my DRB activities. regards………. > ED

Leave a Reply

— required *

— required *